Intelligent Math Programming Software
Session: TD25
Date/Time: Tuesday 14:45-16:15
Type: Sponsored
Sponsor: Optimization Section
Track:
Cluster: Linear Programming & Complementarity
Room:
Chair: Allen Holder
Chair Address: Trinity University, Math Dept., 715 Stadium Dr., San Antonio, TX 78212
Chair E-mail: aholder@trinity.edu
Chair:
Chair Address:
Chair E-mail:
- TD25.1 MProbe: Software for Analyzing Mathematical Programs
- John W. Chinneck;
Carleton University, Systems & Computer Eng., 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6 , Canada;
chinneck@sce.carleton.ca
During formulation and debugging you often need analytic information about your model. Example questions: What are the shapes of the nonlinear functions and constrained region? How effective are the constraints? Which constraints are redundant? MProbe is a software tool for answering analytic questions such as these.
- TD25.2 Linking ANALYZE with AMPL
I wrote an interface that takes AMPL's output files plus a new file type in my ANALYZE utility and produces 2 files as input to ANALYZE. The first is the packed (binary) file that contains LP and solution information; the second is the syntax file that enables English translations and other commands.
- TD25.3 Modern Sensitivity Analysis Software
- Allen Holder;
Trinity University, Math Dept., 715 Stadium Dr., San Antonio, TX 78212;
aholder@trinity.edu
While interior point solvers are readily available, no software is currently available that allows users to perform post-solution analysis based upon strictly complementary solutions. We discuss the new software Sleuth that uses a strictly complementary solution provided by most interior point solvers.
- TD25.4 A Common Framework for Infeasibility, Redundancy & Minimal Representations
- Richard J. Caron;
University of Windsor, Fac. of Science, PO Box 33830, Detroit, MI 48232;
rcaron@uwindsor.ca
- Tim Traynor;
University of Windsor, 401 Sunset, Rm. 9117 LAM, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 , Canada;
tt@uwindsor.ca
We present a common framework from which to examine infeasibility, redundancy and minimal representations for general constraint sets arising in mathematical programming problems. The framework leads naturally to a probabilistic algorithm for finding the data for a certain set-covering problem the analysis of which leads to the identification of an irreducible infeasible system or a minimal representation.
For information on individual presentations, please contact the authors
directly.
Return to Conference home page
|