INFORMS Logo
 

Intelligent Math Programming Software


Session: TD25
Date/Time: Tuesday 14:45-16:15
Type: Sponsored
Sponsor: Optimization Section
Track:
Cluster: Linear Programming & Complementarity
Room:
Chair: Allen Holder
Chair Address: Trinity University, Math Dept., 715 Stadium Dr., San Antonio, TX 78212
Chair E-mail: aholder@trinity.edu
Chair:
Chair Address:
Chair E-mail:

TD25.1 MProbe: Software for Analyzing Mathematical Programs
  • John W. Chinneck; Carleton University, Systems & Computer Eng., 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6 , Canada; chinneck@sce.carleton.ca

During formulation and debugging you often need analytic information about your model. Example questions: What are the shapes of the nonlinear functions and constrained region? How effective are the constraints? Which constraints are redundant? MProbe is a software tool for answering analytic questions such as these.

TD25.2 Linking ANALYZE with AMPL
  • Harvey J. Greenberg; University of Colorado, Mathematics Dept., CB 170, PO Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364; hgreenbe@carbon.cudenver.edu

I wrote an interface that takes AMPL's output files plus a new file type in my ANALYZE utility and produces 2 files as input to ANALYZE. The first is the packed (binary) file that contains LP and solution information; the second is the syntax file that enables English translations and other commands.

TD25.3 Modern Sensitivity Analysis Software
  • Allen Holder; Trinity University, Math Dept., 715 Stadium Dr., San Antonio, TX 78212; aholder@trinity.edu

While interior point solvers are readily available, no software is currently available that allows users to perform post-solution analysis based upon strictly complementary solutions. We discuss the new software Sleuth that uses a strictly complementary solution provided by most interior point solvers.

TD25.4 A Common Framework for Infeasibility, Redundancy & Minimal Representations
  • Richard J. Caron; University of Windsor, Fac. of Science, PO Box 33830, Detroit, MI 48232; rcaron@uwindsor.ca
  • Tim Traynor; University of Windsor, 401 Sunset, Rm. 9117 LAM, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 , Canada; tt@uwindsor.ca

We present a common framework from which to examine infeasibility, redundancy and minimal representations for general constraint sets arising in mathematical programming problems. The framework leads naturally to a probabilistic algorithm for finding the data for a certain set-covering problem the analysis of which leads to the identification of an irreducible infeasible system or a minimal representation.


For information on individual presentations, please contact the authors directly.

Return to Conference home page
Questions on membership, subscriptions and the like should go to INFORMS Customer Service. 
Questions/comments of a general nature about this Web site should go to Editor, IOL. 
Copyright © Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences